nanog mailing list archives
Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
From: Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:54:18 +0300
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:20 AM, alvin nanog < nanogml () mail ddos-mitigator net> wrote:
hi ramy On 08/12/15 at 05:28pm, Ramy Hashish wrote:Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?wouldn't the above "comparison" be kinda funky comparing software solutions with hardware appliances and/or cloud scubbers ?? comparisons between vendors should be between sw solutions, or hw appliances vs other hw, or cloud vs other clouds wanguard should be compared with other sw options or vendors using sflow, netflow, jflow, etc etc http://www.andrisoft.com/software/wanguard http://bitbucket.org/tortoiselabs/ddosmon http://www.github.com/FastVPSEestiOu/fastnetmon http://nfdump.sourceforge.net http://nfsen.sourceforge.net wanguard - software solution using sflow http://www.andrisoft.com/software/wanguard arbor ---- hardware/software solutions -- "peakflow" http://www.arbornetworks.com/products/peakflow radware -- hardware/software/cloud solutions -- "defenseflow" http://www.radware.com/products/attack-mitigation-service/ http://www.radware.com/Products/DefenseFlow/ nsfocus -- hardware/cloud solutions http://www.nsfocus.com/products/ A10 ------ hardware solution http://www.a10network.com/products riorey --- hardware solution http://www.riorey.com/riorey-ddos-products staminus - hardware/cloud solutions http://www.staminus.net/shield # and to add to the ddos confusion .. akamai/prolexic --- hardware/cloud solution f5 ---------------- hardware/cloud solutions http://www.f5.com/resources/white-papers/mitigating-ddos-attacks-with-f5-technology fortinet ---------- custom ASIC hardware and cloud solution http://www.fortinet.com/products/fortiddos/ddos-mitigation-appliances.html
Let me disagree to some extent, we have contacted most of the above vendors, selling a HW doesn't necessarily mean they are HW based solution, most of them run their SW/algorithm on an x86 machine. Thanks, Ramy
Current thread:
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions, (continued)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Aaron (Aug 11)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Matt Taylor (Aug 11)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Aug 11)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Richard Holbo (Aug 10)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Richard Hesse (Aug 28)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Ramy Hashish (Aug 12)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Fabien Delmotte (Aug 12)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Ramy Hashish (Aug 12)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Aug 15)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Fabien Delmotte (Aug 12)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions alvin nanog (Aug 12)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions Ramy Hashish (Aug 26)
- Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Aug 12)
