nanog mailing list archives
Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?
From: bzs () theworld com
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:11:33 -0500
For starters much of the internet infrastructure is built on govt mandated/protected monopolies or very small N oligopolies so is already subject to significant regulation. You can start up a business carrying packages for people for a fee, no harder than any other business. Try spinning up a cable TV or landline or long-distance line business. On December 10, 2015 at 13:32 cma () cmadams net (Chris Adams) wrote:
Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> said:On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny <william.r.kenny () gmail com> wrote:is that still net neutrality?who cares? mobile was excepted from the NN rulings.Any why the desire for extra regulation for Internet services? Shippers (you know, actual Common Carriers) do things like this all the time, especially when they are busy (congested). I had a package ship Tuesday; it sat at the receiving location for 24 hours before the first move, then it reached my city early this morning, but since I didn't pay extra for timed delivery (and the shipper doesn't have special arrangements), it didn't go on a truck today. I should get it tomorrow. I could have paid more to get it faster, and some large-scale shippers have special arrangements that seem to get their packages priority. How is this different from Internet traffic? -- Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | bzs () TheWorld com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202 | Login: 617-739-WRLD
The World | Public Access Internet | Since 1989 *oo*
Current thread:
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Collin Anderson (Dec 08)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Kenny (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Christopher Morrow (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Chris Adams (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Christopher Morrow (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Mike Hale (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Hugo Slabbert (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jared Mauch (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? bzs (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? bzs (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Christopher Morrow (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jean-Francois Mezei (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Owen DeLong (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jean-Francois Mezei (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Kenny (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Herrin (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jean-Francois Mezei (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Owen DeLong (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? William Herrin (Dec 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Ethan Katz-Bassett (Dec 10)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Constantine A. Murenin (Dec 11)
