nanog mailing list archives

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?


From: bzs () theworld com
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:11:33 -0500


For starters much of the internet infrastructure is built on govt
mandated/protected monopolies or very small N oligopolies so is
already subject to significant regulation.

You can start up a business carrying packages for people for a fee, no
harder than any other business.

Try spinning up a cable TV or landline or long-distance line business.

On December 10, 2015 at 13:32 cma () cmadams net (Chris Adams) wrote:
Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> said:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny
<william.r.kenny () gmail com> wrote:
is that still net neutrality?

who cares? mobile was excepted from the NN rulings.

Any why the desire for extra regulation for Internet services?

Shippers (you know, actual Common Carriers) do things like this all the
time, especially when they are busy (congested).  I had a package ship
Tuesday; it sat at the receiving location for 24 hours before the first
move, then it reached my city early this morning, but since I didn't pay
extra for timed delivery (and the shipper doesn't have special
arrangements), it didn't go on a truck today.  I should get it tomorrow.

I could have paid more to get it faster, and some large-scale shippers
have special arrangements that seem to get their packages priority.  How
is this different from Internet traffic?

-- 
Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs () TheWorld com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD
The World              | Public Access Internet     | Since 1989     *oo*


Current thread: