nanog mailing list archives

Re: de-peering for security sake


From: Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:54:09 -0500

Speaking as a former DNSBL operator, NANOG has a poor history of
dealing with those who report abuse as well.

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:

why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports,
normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate
abuse albeit compromised machines


This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do
not respond to abuse reports.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


Current thread: