nanog mailing list archives

RE: Re: Checkpoint IPS


From: "Darden, Patrick" <Patrick.Darden () p66 com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:47:29 +0000


Auto-Update can cause problems.  I take the stance that updates should be verified in a CERT or ISO first, before being 
operationalized.
--p

-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Johnston [mailto:colinj () gt86car org uk] 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 10:46 AM
To: Darden, Patrick
Cc: Colin Johnston; Roland Dobbins; nanog () nanog org
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Checkpoint IPS

Yes, update can cause problems, same as router code updates as well.
but update is price of progress.

Col

On 6 Feb 2015, at 16:44, Darden, Patrick <Patrick.Darden () p66 com> wrote:


Sorry, didn't mean to imply otherwise.  Had an incident back in ~2004 where an IPS signature update closed ALL 
network traffic.  Including fix-it updates.  Definitely a case where the IPS caused major difficulties for a network.

--p

-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Johnston [mailto:colinj () gt86car org uk] 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 10:32 AM
To: Darden, Patrick
Cc: Colin Johnston; Roland Dobbins; nanog () nanog org
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Checkpoint IPS

Thought I would add

Astaro IPS works great, great functionality and does prevent ddos and exploits.

Colin



Current thread: