nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit
From: Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:33:17 -0500
Dave Waters <davewaters1970 () gmail com> writes:
http://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/2vxj9u/very_elegant_and_a_simple_way_to_secure_bfd/ Authentication mechanisms defined for IGPs cannot be used to protect BFD since the rate at which packets are processed in BFD is very high. Dave
One might profitably ask why BFD wasn't designed to take advantage of high-TTL-shadowing, a la draft-gill-btsh. -r
Current thread:
- Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Dave Waters (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Glen Kent (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Eygene Ryabinkin (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Glen Kent (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Sudeep Khuraijam (Feb 20)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Glen Kent (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 15)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Saku Ytti (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Dave Waters (Feb 17)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Rob Seastrom (Feb 16)
- Re: Interesting BFD discussion on reddit Hugo Slabbert (Feb 17)
