Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices.

[Bacon Zombie <baconzombie () gmail com>]

You also have to watch out for issues with the Pi corrupting SD cards.
On 19 Feb 2015 01:04, "Geoff Mulligan" <nanog08 () mulligan org> wrote:

> I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers.  I don't know if
> the ethernet port on the Bone is on the USB bus. It is slightly more
> expensive than a PI, but they have worked well for me.
>
>         Geoff
>
> On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Peter Loron wrote:
>
> > For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an
> > issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates.
> >
> > Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that included
> > ethernet.
> >
> > -Pete
> >
> > On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
> >
> > > What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus
> > > and thus limited to USB speeds.
> > >
> > > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole
> > > <mcole.mailinglists () gmail com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015  4:30 PM
> > > (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog () nanog org >> 'NANOG list'"
> > > <nanog () nanog org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances"
> > > for remote offices. </div><div>
> > > </div>