nanog mailing list archives
Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:46:25 +0000
I¹m not sure who gets to definitively answer the question (I would guess that case law will develop around it but IANAL), but this sort of caveat has been in the Open Internet rules for awhile. In general it means ISPs can¹t block stuff like Facebook but have latitude to do stuff like block a site/IP address that may be the source of an attack, etc. - Jason On 2/27/15, 2:24 PM, "Bruce H McIntosh" <bhm () ufl edu> wrote:
On 2015-02-27 14:14, Jim Richardson wrote:What's a "lawful" web site?Now *there* is a $64,000 question. Even more interesting is, "Who gets to decide day to day the answer to that question?" :)
Current thread:
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Livingood, Jason (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] deleskie (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Owen DeLong (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 27)
- Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...] Owen DeLong (Feb 27)
