nanog mailing list archives
Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:55:23 +0200
On 28/1/15 16:45, Colin Johnston wrote:
qnx os based router works well with powerpc, could be pushed far higher load than intel based chips
The problem being that QNX is a 32-bit kernel. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations, (continued)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Baldur Norddahl (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Phil Bedard (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Hugo Slabbert (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Eduardo Schoedler (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Jim Shankland (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Robert Bays (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Paul S. (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Robert Bays (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Charles N Wyble (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Colin Johnston (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Mark Tinka (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Nick Hilliard (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Baldur Norddahl (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Eduardo Meyer (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Adrian Chadd (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Ray Soucy (Jan 29)