nanog mailing list archives
RE: cable modem firmware upgrade
From: "Sam Hayes Merritt, III" <sam () themerritts org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:56:50 -0600 (CST)
That has been my experience as well (only from the RF side) and I would believe this was a design choice. The ISP usually wants to keep control over the firmware versions of the CM for various technical/support reasons versus having consumers mess with the firmware.
Its a design choice but not one that always works out well.Customers that bring their own modems that aren't on a "certified" list, end up with a device that the provider may not have ever seen. Then, if you run into an issue with the modem that can be fixed with a firmware issue (some vendors have issues that they cannot fix - rhymes with netgear) then the MSO has to work with the maker of that modem, even though they may have never had any interactions with them, get the certificate and firmware for that modem and upgrade customer owned devices - possibly turning them into bricks. I'd rather allow customers to turn their own modems into bricks.
sam
Current thread:
- cable modem firmware upgrade A MEKKAOUI (Jan 28)
- RE: cable modem firmware upgrade Nathan Anderson (Jan 28)
- RE: cable modem firmware upgrade Frank Bulk (Jan 28)
- RE: cable modem firmware upgrade Paul Stewart (Jan 29)
- RE: cable modem firmware upgrade Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Jan 29)
- Re: cable modem firmware upgrade Scott Helms (Jan 30)
- Re: cable modem firmware upgrade Rob Seastrom (Jan 30)
- RE: cable modem firmware upgrade Paul Stewart (Jan 30)
- RE: cable modem firmware upgrade Nathan Anderson (Jan 28)
