nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:45:38 -0400
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:05:00 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
Look again… IPv6 is already more than 20% of Google traffic in the US.
20% of *1* site's traffic does not equal 20% DEPLOYMENT. (read: 20% of internet DEVICES (CPE) connected by IPv6)
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Stephen Satchell (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Joe Maimon (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Tim Franklin (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Matthew Huff (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Tinka (Jul 10)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Matthew Kaufman (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Andrews (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion John Curran (Jul 09)
- Also Facebook (was: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion) John Curran (Jul 09)
- Re: Also Facebook (was: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion) Ricky Beam (Jul 09)
- Re: Also Facebook (was: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion) Nicholas Suan (Jul 09)
- Re: Also Facebook (was: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion) John Curran (Jul 10)
- Re: Also Facebook (was: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion) Ricky Beam (Jul 10)
- Re: Also Facebook (was: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion) Jared Mauch (Jul 10)
