Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

["Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>]

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:20:08 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> > > That's the big difference - IPv6 has been designed to provide abundant
> > > address space.
> >
> > There is no amount of fixed address space that can't be consumed with  
> > stupid allocation policies.
>
> True. However, are you making the argument that any of the current or  
> proposed allocation policies are, in fact, stupid in such a way that  
> this is likely?

What seems like a great idea today becomes tomorrow's "what the f*** were  
they thinking".