nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:43:26 -0700
On Jun 15, 2015, at 11:54 AM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote: I think you've offered some really bad advice here Bill.
As I said, there are lots of people who _think_ it doesn’t work. And then there are people who’ve actually done it,
and know better.
Besides, you seem to not have read what I actually posted. In which the advice I gave was _not_ to do anycast TCP, so
as to avoid having to deal with people who _think_ they know something, and are excessively verbal about it. Which is
tedious.
Perhaps better advice would have been to go ahead and do it, solving his problem, but to just not post to NANOG about
it, so he doesn’t have to listen to people who think they know better telling him that what he’s doing isn’t possible.
Bumblebees, flight, etc.
-Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Dave Taht (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Randy Bush (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Dave Taht (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Matt Palmer (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rafael Possamai (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Orthoefer (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Levine (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Mark Andrews (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? James Hartig (Jun 19)
