nanog mailing list archives

Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4

From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:12:26 -0700

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Luan Nguyen <lnguyen () opsource net> wrote:

Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it?
Just for NATTING on Cisco gears...


most things, including most cisco gear, will not forward those Class E
packets or accept Class E as a valid address

If you have success, please report it to the list.

Current thread:

Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Luan Nguyen (Jun 17)
- Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Ca By (Jun 17)
  - Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Luan Nguyen (Jun 17)
    - Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Eduardo Schoedler (Jun 17)
- RE: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Tony Wicks (Jun 17)
  - Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Rafael Possamai (Jun 17)
- Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Josh Luthman (Jun 17)
- Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Ricky Beam (Jun 17)
  - Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 William Herrin (Jun 17)
    - Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Ca By (Jun 17)
    - Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Mark Andrews (Jun 17)
    - Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4 Ricky Beam (Jun 17)

(Thread continues...)