nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: Mike Meredith <mike.meredith () port ac uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:39:07 +0100
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:51:31 -0400, "Joe Abley" <jabley () hopcount ca> may have written:
Since DHCP uses broadcast and multicast addresses when a client is discovering a server, it's not obvious why you'd have to.
And broadcast/multicast when renewing a lease (DHCPREQUEST). You will of course see unicast addresses on the server side if the server is seeing requests forwarded by a udp helper.
You can run redundant sets of isc-dhcpd servers together serving the same broadcast domain and have them assign leases from the same address pools (at least, I've never tried it, but I was within
Indeed. Rock solid in my experience (on a "little" network). -- Mike Meredith, University of Portsmouth Principal Systems Engineer, Hostmaster, Security, and Timelord!
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rob Seastrom (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Nick Hilliard (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Larry Sheldon (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Jonas Björk (Jun 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Larry Sheldon (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Mike Meredith (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Baldur Norddahl (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Masataka Ohta (Jun 18)
