Re: Akamai minimum prefix length issue

["Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>]

Akamai does not follow BGP perfectly, for many reasons, including BGP preferring crappy paths much of the time.

ISPs should email NetSupport-tix () akamai com to get help with traffic engineering, performance, and other questions. 
(Or at least that used to be the case a year ago.)

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

> On May 13, 2015, at 15:33 , Chuck Church <chuckchurch () gmail com> wrote:
>
> Anyone from Akamai (or who might know),
>
>       Having an issue with AS 20940 either not seeing or ignoring a /23
> we're announcing, and following a /22 to another path.  Other ISPs our
> upstream peers with see the /23.  I didn't see a looking glass for Akamai to
> verify.  Anyone from Akamai able to help?  Prefix in question is
> 162.220.232.0/23. 
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chuck