nanog mailing list archives

RE: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks


From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 06:44:10 -0600


Without a concomitant increase in "trustworthy", assigning greater levels of trust is fools endeavour.  Whatever this 
trusted network initiative is, I take that  it was designed by fools or government (the two are usually 
indistinguishable) for the purpose of creating utterly untrustworthy networks.

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Ramy Hashish
Sent: Sunday, 24 May, 2015 22:49
To: morrowc.lists () gmail com; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks

The idea of restricting access to a certain content during an attack on
the
"trusted networks" only will make all interested ISPs be more "trusted"

Ramy

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists () gmail com
wrote:

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:12 PM, jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
wrote:
However, the trusted network initiative might be a good approach to
start
influencing operators to apply anti-spoofing mechanisms.


explain how you think the 'trusted network initiative' matters in the
slightest?

-chris





Current thread: