nanog mailing list archives
Re: /27 the new /24
From: Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 17:58:26 +0200
Hi,
Op 4 okt. 2015, om 16:52 heeft Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> het volgende geschreven: If it doesn't support IPSec, it's not really IPv6. Just as if it failed to support any other mandatory IPv6 specification, such as RA.
I think you're still looking at an old version of the IPv6 Node Requirements. Check https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6434#section-11, specifically this bit: """ Previously, IPv6 mandated implementation of IPsec and recommended the key management approach of IKE. This document updates that recommendation by making support of the IPsec Architecture a SHOULD for all IPv6 nodes. """ This was published in December 2011. Cheers, Sander
Current thread:
- Re: /27 the new /24, (continued)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Stephen Satchell (Oct 09)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Lee Howard (Oct 09)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Mike (Oct 12)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Baldur Norddahl (Oct 12)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Lee Howard (Oct 12)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Jon Lewis (Oct 08)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Denis Fondras (Oct 08)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Joe Abley (Oct 07)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Stephen Satchell (Oct 07)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Sander Steffann (Oct 04)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Mel Beckman (Oct 04)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Mel Beckman (Oct 07)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Randy Bush (Oct 04)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Nick Hilliard (Oct 04)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Stephen Satchell (Oct 04)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Mel Beckman (Oct 04)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Denis Fondras (Oct 04)
- Re: /27 the new /24 Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
