nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Irony.
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:08:20 +1100
In message <56263D2F.5000606 () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>, Masataka Ohta writes:
Max Tulyev wrote:On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in hardware.Certainly.Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on...Customer support for IPv6 costs a lot, at least because of: 1) Unnecessarily lengthy IP addresses, not recognized by most, if not all, customers 2) Lack of so promised automatic renumbering
Upgrade the vendors. Nodes already renumber themselves automatically when a new prefix appears. Nodes can update their addresses in the DNS if the want to securely using DNS UPDATE and TSIG / SIG(0). Apple does this on Darwin. You have to supply the name and credentials (Preferences -> Sharing Edit. Tick "Use dynamic global hostname" and fill in the details). Microsoft does it with DNS UPDATE and GSS-TSIG after registering the machine in the Active Directory database. If two vendors can do this so can the rest. This isn't rocket science. Firewall vendors could supply tools to allow nodes to update their addresses in the firewall. They could even co-ordinate through a standards body. It isn't that hard to take names, turn them into addresses and push out new firewall rules on demand as address associated with those names change. Similarly with everything else that takes a address. It just requires that you think. "There is a address/prefix here. How do I automatically update it." The DNS is a pull mechanism with updates being pushed to it. It isn't that hard to design a generic push mechanism that applications could hook into to receive noticed of address updates pushed to them.
3) So stateful SLAACSo upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient for IPv6 adoption ;)Upgrade IETF to upgrade IPv6. Masataka Ohta
-- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Irony., (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Ca By (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Max Tulyev (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Stephen Satchell (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Max Tulyev (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Paul S. (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Yucong Sun (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Ca By (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Max Tulyev (Oct 13)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Rinse Kloek (Oct 20)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Sander Steffann (Oct 20)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Ca By (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Masataka Ohta (Oct 20)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Mark Andrews (Oct 20)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Masataka Ohta (Oct 21)
- RE: IPv6 Irony. Nicholas Warren (Oct 22)
- RE: IPv6 Irony. Nicholas Warren (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Hugo Slabbert (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Irony. Masataka Ohta (Oct 22)
