nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP choice
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:48:14 +0300
On 23 October 2015 at 08:31, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote: Hey,
Quagga is an example of a case where IS-IS is seriously lagging behind OSPF to the point of not being useable at all.
I believe this is because you need 802.3 (as opposed to EthernetII) and rudimentary CLNS implementation, both which are very annoying from programmer point of view. I hope ISIS would migrate to EthernetII and IP. From security point of view, people often state how it's better that it's not IP, but in reality, how many have verified the flip side of this proposal, how easy it is to protect yourself from ISIS attack from connected host? For some platforms the answer is, there is absolutely no way, and any connected host can bring you down with trivial amount of data. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: IGP choice, (continued)
- Re: IGP choice Randy via NANOG (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Dave Bell (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice sthaug (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Baldur Norddahl (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Pablo Lucena (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice A . L . M . Buxey (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice thomas nanog (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Bill Blackford (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Saku Ytti (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Saku Ytti (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Matthew Petach (Oct 30)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 30)
