nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:58 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 8/Sep/15 22:41, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
Oh, it doesn't *need* that many. You can go ahead and run your IPv6
subnets
with a /96 or /112. Just remember that will piss off any hardware that
tries
to do SLAAC. or a few other things.... :)
Well, if you use DHCPv6 IA_NA for the CPE WAN link, you can go down as low as /128 per CPE device. And then you use DHCP-PD for the onward assignment to the customer's network. Mark. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV8A9OAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GffYP/1PaWRPiiWeKAmMnCfbG9Wsr tqNxWIFErIbNjVQpyEJoGRq1AQcygPs1G1ZXL60UnMPi0dpjuxGhr3WboWHuxu2T cXfjdA67l/0SI6dgQJVM+rKlB7hyEun6cSZQ+tcr99nb5DYC80yg1ebYSc/8ulzP 9ZCTb/xAFQsXxnYEj0wjFQSLK3H+4lMbS9jq09/yTAW+6GzJYQZoQY5Wcq3Nn8RI Z+OquW1238B2wvqhzBAAYn3mmFrYXa4mZRpsqilzd8EwpYHk5UfkpYz6k8JX7MnR JsiZ/1D+t9cjRDBozNfPmnr9quIiy35RpzCZNmsG8Ye8jvhvEvlzopZZ/qoKFxpr pZzSxe5+ek0D9sF+cGLNa1EqJciVhe2bF6KLeW/qjtVfOhvevWx22CkBVKk+wvH6 5Hmw/u7PLSFNyG4W42xnPJ0rYM6FMfSpFUCCwqWiLnrLBn1/vtTQHZaBBpg7mkqd DUmAbGgRenT9oGL1pUzieqJoBREbGxZZSD6OTP/nhiBybKRTG8IM2XNgZZjirLOx j0iiWDltCLpBdmclsC4CSWEVzVohbDp+QLl36C6S8VQQDE1MYlbzmKN6xkGuG8vf U+HFteElBXQychFiSswiyofT25uT1OkxxKcV5neh8bv8JJ1i58oSja7E62kOps/n DeYpbYNbCLqGiZ2IenXh =B6fv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Matthew Kaufman (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Baldur Norddahl (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Clinton Work (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Clinton Work (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 10)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Bjørn Mork (Sep 12)
