nanog mailing list archives
Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:47:24 +0200
On 24/Sep/15 15:21, William Herrin wrote:
Hi Jason, That's normal. Verizon does it too. Both have "community" tags which you can attach to your route advertisement. Each will have one that indicates they should give external routes the same "local pref" as the route you announce to them. Tagging your route announcement with the proper community will cause them to route based on AS path length as you expect.
Depending on the provider, this can't always be guaranteed, i.e., that the available LOCAL_PREF values a customer can trigger via a BGP community support anything <= what routes the network considers "external". What's possible (or available) may also be influenced by whether one's upstream is "transit-free" or not, I imagine. Mark.
Current thread:
- Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Jason Bullen (Sep 23)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Jared Mauch (Sep 23)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Clinton Work (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Mark Tinka (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Mark Tinka (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Stephen Satchell (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Blake Hudson (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Jason Bullen (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Bob Evans (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Stephen Satchell (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Blake Hudson (Sep 24)
- Re: Service Providers behaviour for dual homed enterprises Blake Hudson (Sep 24)
