Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

["Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins () arbor net>]

On 2 Sep 2015, at 16:48, Mark Tinka wrote:

> Those VLAN's and VRF's are following the same path as the global 
> table, just in a different routing table. That is easy, and we do that 
> already.

Sure.  But it's better than mixing it in with customer traffic.

> Your assertion, before, was that the OoB network is physically 
> separate from the routers it is supporting. This is less feasible at 
> scale.

Ideally, it should be - that's what I was trying to get across.  I 
understand that this isn't free, either from a capex or opex 
perspective.

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>