nanog mailing list archives

Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115


From: "Rampley Jr, Jim F" <jim.rampley () charter com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:26:48 -0500



On 9/28/15, 10:24 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Seth Mattinen"
<nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of sethm () rollernet us> wrote:

On 9/28/15 20:19, Martin Hannigan wrote:

Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-)

We'll take a look and get back to you.  Thanks for caring!



Yep, that's one of the affected prefixes.

~Seth
Hi Seth, which market was this occurring?  Was this already removed?  I'm
not seeing it this morning.  I would like to figure out what went wrong
here.  We shouldn't be nailing up any static configuration to have caused
a situation like this.


Current thread: