nanog mailing list archives

RE: Brighthouse Orlando Port blocking ISAKMP


From: "Eric C. Miller" <eric () ericheather com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 03:38:39 +0000

All is well, now.

It appears that it may have been on XO's network. My crypto tunnel between AT&T and BH crossed XO, and asymmetric 
routing from my office network had Cogent and XO outgoing, and Level3 on the return. If I forced my office connection 
to use Level3 for the outbound, the tunnel established immediately.

Brighthouse's phone support was a grade F, by the way. Their phone support had me yanked around for an hour, before 
they finally consulted with Tier3. After relaying the response, which was simply, "BH doesn't filter customer traffic - 
It must be on your side," I asked to speak with them directly. The person I was speaking to proceeded to tell me that 
Tier-3 had just closed, and that they would have to call me back. It was 48 hours before I received a call back.

Grr.



Eric Miller, CCNP
Network Engineering Consultant




-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Mallette, Edwin J
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 9:54 AM
To: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Brighthouse Orlando Port blocking ISAKMP

Hi Erik,

We definitely do not filter UDP500 across our network.  I¹m going to reach out to you directly to see if I can help 
figure out what¹s going on.

Cheers!

Ed

On 7/30/16, 11:38 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Eric C. Miller"
<nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of eric () ericheather com> wrote:

Hello!

Subject says it all!!! I cannot open any IPSec tunnels, because UDP 500 
is not making it through to my Brighthouse connection. I've tried from 
Level3, Cogent, and AT&T. Are there any Brighthouse engineers on that 
would help me shed some light on this?

Thank you,

Eric



Current thread: