nanog mailing list archives
Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase
From: Dan Drown <dan-nanog () drown org>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 21:09:58 -0600
Quoting Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>:
Do you have flow telemetry, which provides a lot more information than basic pps/bps stats?
Sources are pretty widely spread out among cell networks/home internet, seem to be mostly US based. I'm not seeing a large amount of traffic per single IP or single subnet. This seems more like "someone pushed out bad firmware" rather than something malicious.
Are you seeing normal timesync queries, or lots of level-6/level-7 admin command attempts?
SNTP Client timesync queries make up 91.3% of the traffic to my server.The following NTP settings being most the popular (47% of all traffic to my server):
stratum=0, poll=4, precision=-6, root delay=1, root dispersion=1, reference timestamp=0, originator timestamp=0,
receive timestamp=0
Current thread:
- Recent NTP pool traffic increase Jose Gerardo Perales Soto (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Blake Hudson (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Dan Drown (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase joel jaeggli (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Kraig Beahn (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Roland Dobbins (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Dan Drown (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Roland Dobbins (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Roland Dobbins (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Roland Dobbins (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Dan Drown (Dec 15)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Roland Dobbins (Dec 16)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Roland Dobbins (Dec 16)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Andreas Ott (Dec 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Gary E. Miller (Dec 17)
- Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase Gary E. Miller (Dec 17)
