nanog mailing list archives

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems


From: Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:28:22 -0600

There was an afmug thread about this exact issue several months ago.

On Dec 5, 2016 9:57 AM, "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

Ah, this is the first I've heard of slow fast.com performance with
someone actually connected to them. Usually it's an ISP that's a few AS
hops away from Netflix.




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions

Midwest Internet Exchange

The Brothers WISP

----- Original Message -----

From: "Josh Reynolds" <josh () kyneticwifi com>
To: "Steven Miano" <mianosm () gmail com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 9:51:30 AM
Subject: Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G
server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a
Netflix open connect appliance.

On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano" <mianosm () gmail com> wrote:

fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page.

...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to
speedtest.<ISP>.net|com than some of those others.

There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew).

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston <
johnstong () westmancom com>
wrote:

For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net
on
our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include
more
detailed results.

I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can
likely
have a local instance of:

* Speedtest.net

* Sourceforge.net/speedtest

* Dslreports.com/speedtest

Are there others? What is your preferred one and why?

Thanks,
Graham




--
Miano, Steven M.
http://stevenmiano.com





Current thread: