nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT firewall for IPv6?
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:22:15 +0200
On 5 July 2016 at 17:40, Lee <ler762 () gmail com> wrote:
Right. But how long is it going to take to secure the Palo Alto firewall? If the central Cisco Catalyst really is an IPv6 router, doing a conf t ipv6 access-list denyIPv6 deny ipv6 any any interface [whatever connects to the ISP] ipv6 traffic-filter denyIPv6 in ipv6 traffic-filter denyIPv6 out end would be a quick fix for the firewall not doing any ipv6 filtering.
Nope, that is not going to stop his IPv6 address from appearing, which I will bet you good money is in the range of fe80::/64.
Current thread:
- NAT firewall for IPv6? Edgar Carver (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Spencer Ryan (Jul 05)
- RE: NAT firewall for IPv6? Naslund, Steve (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Lee (Jul 05)
- RE: NAT firewall for IPv6? Naslund, Steve (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Lee (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Baldur Norddahl (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? A . L . M . Buxey (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Jason R (Jul 06)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Lee (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Dovid Bender (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Bruce Curtis (Jul 05)
- RE: NAT firewall for IPv6? Naslund, Steve (Jul 05)
- Re: NAT firewall for IPv6? Spencer Ryan (Jul 05)
