nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:24:50 -0700
On Friday, July 22, 2016, Ricardo Ferreira <ricardofbferreira () gmail com> wrote:
Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed?
We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I
am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it
is /64 or /128.
In RFC 3177, it says:
3. Address Delegation Recommendations
The IESG and the IAB recommend the allocations for the boundary
between the public and the private topology to follow those general
rules:
- /48 in the general case, except for very large subscribers.
- /64 when it is known that one and only one subnet is needed by
design.
- /128 when it is absolutely known that one and only one device
is connecting.
Basically a sole device will be connecting to the internet so I am
wondering if this rule is follwed.
Cheers
Phones, as in 3gpp? If so, each phone alway gets a /64, there is no choice. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6459
-- Ricardo Ferreira
Current thread:
- IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ricardo Ferreira (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers james machado (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ryan, Spencer (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ca By (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Baldur Norddahl (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ryan, Spencer (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Tore Anderson (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Baldur Norddahl (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Mikhail Gusarov (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Carsten Bormann (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers james machado (Jul 22)
