nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP and Optical domains?
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:58:51 +0900
Mark Tinka wrote:
By not managing transport characteristics at all except that links are on or off (or, if you want to guarantee QoS, a little more than that).But how do Layer 3 protocols manage transport characteristics today?
Today??? You asked "can be better designed", didn't you?
And, don't miss the following assumption:
> L3 HELO generated frequently enough.
> Again, this does not seem too removed from what happens already today.
The problem, if any, is that doing much more than that
results in "heavily underutilized" network.
> I don't disagree with what you imply by "heavily".
The implication is not mine.
Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IP and Optical domains?, (continued)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Masataka Ohta (Jun 22)
- Re: IP and Optical domains? Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
