nanog mailing list archives
Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy?
From: Jeff Gehlbach <jeffg () opennms org>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 18:29:52 -0400
On 05/23/2016 05:51 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
Exposing the data via SNMP on the host to be monitored distributes the CPU load individually onto each host
So much this. Most importantly, it removes the fork/exec overhead from the monitoring server.
This allows cacti or opennms or anything else to poll the hosts to be monitored via something that scales better than php script workers, using the 'spine' SNMP data acquisition method and the equivalent in other snmp polling platforms.
Point of fact for OpenNMS users: all our collectors are in-process, so in cases where SNMP is impractical you can use the XML/JSON or JDBC or WS-Management collector and still achieve great scale with a single server. But SNMP still scales and interoperates like nothing else. -jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Nathan Anderson (May 20)
- Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Eric Kuhnke (May 20)
- RE: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Nathan Anderson (May 20)
- Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Eric Lindsjö (May 23)
- Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Eric Kuhnke (May 23)
- Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Josh Reynolds (May 23)
- Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Jeff Gehlbach (May 23)
- RE: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Nathan Anderson (May 20)
- Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Eric Kuhnke (May 20)
- Message not available
- Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Eric Kuhnke (May 23)
- Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Wes Hardaker (May 24)
- RE: SNMP "bridging"/proxy? Nathan Anderson (May 20)
