nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 07:37:31 +0200
On 2/May/16 22:32, Richard Hicks wrote:
Careful with the ASR1000 and full tables at 4GB. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/180710 I recommend adding some third party RAM to get 16GB.
It will be fine with 4GB of RAM provided the OP does not enable software redundancy. Mark.
Current thread:
- BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mike (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers James Milko (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers lincoln dale (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mark Tinka (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Bob Evans (May 02)
- RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Gustav Ulander (May 02)
- RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Tony Wicks (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Richard Hicks (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mark Tinka (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
- RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Eric Sabotta (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mike (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
- SV: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Gustav Ulander (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Nick Hilliard (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Ćukasz Bromirski (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mike (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers James Milko (May 02)
