nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?
From: Eitan Adler <lists () eitanadler com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:06:18 -0700
On 24 October 2016 at 01:25, LHC <large.hadron.collider () gmx com> wrote:
All this TTL talk makes me think. Why not have two ttls - a 'must-recheck' (does not expire the record but forces a recheck; updates record if server replies & serial has incremented) and a 'must-delete' (cache will be stale at this point)?
If clients can't get one TTL correct what makes you think they will get a more complicated two TTL system correct? -- Eitan Adler
Current thread:
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?, (continued)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Keenan Tims (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Rob Szarka (Oct 22)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? david raistrick (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Eitan Adler (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? George William Herbert (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Masood Ahmad Shah (Oct 22)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Mark Andrews (Oct 23)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? LHC (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? LHC (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Eitan Adler (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Suzanne Woolf (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? joel jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Måns Nilsson (Oct 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Måns Nilsson (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Crist Clark (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Brett Frankenberger (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Josh Reynolds (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Josh Reynolds (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? - dns alvin nanog (Oct 21)
