nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:09:51 -0700
--- dougm.work () gmail com wrote: From: Doug Montgomery <dougm.work () gmail com> If only there were a global system, with consistent and verifiable security properties, to permit address holders to declare the set of AS's authorized to announce their prefixes, and routers anywhere on the Internet to independently verify the corresponding validity of received announcements. *cough https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=2846 cough* ------------------------------------------------ Yes, RPKI. That's what I was waiting for. Now we can get to a real discussion... ;-) scott
Current thread:
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?, (continued)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Justin Paine via NANOG (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Tom Beecher (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 15)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 19)
