nanog mailing list archives
Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:44:13 -0600
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
For instance, someone cannot take Verisign’s root cert and create a cert which collides on SHA-1. Or at least we do not think they can. We’ll know in 90 days when Google releases the code.
Maybe. If you assume that no SHA attack was known to anybody at the time the Verisign cert was originally created, And that the process used to originally create Verisign's root cert was not tainted to leverage such attack. If it was tainted, then maybe there's another version of the certificate that was constructed with a different Subject name and Subject public key, but the same SHA1 hash, and same Issuer Name and same Issuer Public Key.
-- TTFN,
-- -JH
Current thread:
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble, (continued)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Vincent Bernat (Feb 24)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Ricky Beam (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 23)
- RE: SHA1 collisions proven possisble David Edelman (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Lyndon Nerenberg (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Florian Weimer (Feb 24)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Jimmy Hess (Feb 25)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Nick Hilliard (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Brett Frankenberger (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Matt Palmer (Feb 26)
- RE: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Keith Medcalf (Feb 26)
- RE: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Jon Lewis (Feb 27)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Eitan Adler (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Randy Bush (Feb 27)
