nanog mailing list archives
Re: Passive Optical Network (PON)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:35:00 -0600 (CST)
Conversely, many places still can't even handle a full table. ;-) ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "joel jaeggli" <joelja () bogus com> To: "Kenneth McRae" <kenneth.mcrae () me com>, "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 3:31:18 PM Subject: Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) On 1/21/17 8:44 AM, Kenneth McRae wrote:
Greeting all, Is anyone out there using PON in a campus or facility environment? I am talking to a few vendors who are pushing PON as a replacement for edge switching on the campus and in some cases, ToR switch in the DC. Opinions on this technology would be greatly appreciated.
The datacenter tor / host evironments I'm exposed to generally consider 10Gb/s or Nx10 to be the performance floor not the ceiling. To my thinking 100gig lr4 results in a substantial reduction in fiber/optic/port count which will in the long more than offset the increased cost something that didn't really happen with 40gig.
Thanks, Kenneth
Current thread:
- Passive Optical Network (PON) Kenneth McRae (Jan 21)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) joel jaeggli (Jan 21)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) Mike Hammett (Jan 21)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) Carlos Alcantar (Jan 22)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) Stas Bilder (Jan 22)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) Leo Bicknell (Jan 23)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) Josh Reynolds (Jan 23)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) Leo Bicknell (Jan 23)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) Max Tulyev (Jan 23)
- Re: Passive Optical Network (PON) joel jaeggli (Jan 21)
