nanog mailing list archives
Re: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave"
From: Rod Beck <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:50:48 +0000
Thanks. I think that makes sense. - R. ________________________________ From: Tony Wicks <tony () wicks co nz> Sent: Sunday, October 1, 2017 10:33 PM To: Rod Beck Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave" I would suggest they are asking if it is to be carried on an active (Powered) DWDM ADM (Add Drop Mux), or over passive optical Mux's (short range). -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Rod Beck Sent: Monday, 2 October 2017 9:19 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave" A financial firm asked me if a 10 gig wave offer was an "active wave". 😨 LAN PHY 10 GigE, WAN PHY 10 GigE, transparent, STM64, OC192. Yes. Active? Roderick Beck Director of Global Sales United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com>> 85 Király utca, 1077 Budapest rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com 36-30-859-5144 [1467221477350_image005.png]
Current thread:
- Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave" Rod Beck (Oct 01)
- RE: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave" Tony Wicks (Oct 01)
- Re: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave" Rod Beck (Oct 01)
- Re: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave" jeff herbel (Oct 01)
- Re: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave" Justin Wilson (Oct 16)
- RE: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave" Tony Wicks (Oct 01)
