nanog mailing list archives

Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too)

From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 18:58:36 -0500

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

I agree we all have a responsibility to hold the line on addresses being
network identifiers



Hi Owen,

The delicious irony here is that EUI-64 supporting SLAAC is exactly that:
an identifier. If we hold the line there, there is no line.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>

Current thread:

Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) valdis . kletnieks (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Andrew Kirch (Jan 01)
  - Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) bzs (Jan 02)
    - Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Owen DeLong (Jan 02)
    - Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) William Herrin (Jan 02)
    - Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Owen DeLong (Jan 03)