nanog mailing list archives

Re: IRR AS-SET best practices - AS-SET Clash


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:20:55 -0500

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:23:48PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Alain Hebert wrote:
        Any feedback on best practices and "other avenue" about IRR naming?

Known problem - you're asking for trouble unless you filter IRRDB
queries by source:

There isn't a global namespace for as-set names, unless you use source:
as a database key element.

        I've found best practice to be use AS23456 to identify the owner.
(assuming you are 23456).  Using something else like AS-CLOUD is likely
to cause conflicts as there are many clouds out there.

        Much of the problem here is the limited namespace/concept space
and people get stuck saying IRR sucks when IRR/whois is often a method
to access a database.  We have advanced quite far in the past 20 years
in how to build databases, realtime query methods, etc.. but it's not
made it to the routing ecosystem.

        - Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.


Current thread: