Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of Cogent, GTT, and Level3

[Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>]

"we are not the internet police" right? (

On 26/06/18, 10:33 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Job Snijders" <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of job () instituut 
net> wrote:

    On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 22:49, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg () tristatelogic com>
    wrote:
    
    > Without the generous support of Cogent, GTT, and Level3 this dumbass
    > lowlife IP address space thief would be largely if not entirely toast.
    > So what are they waiting for?  Why don't their turf this jackass?  Are
    > they waiting for an engraved invitation or what?
    >
    > As I always ask, retorically, in cases like this:  Where are the grownups?
    
    
    
    You could ask the same about the IXPs that facilitate the reach and impact
    of Bitcanal’s BGP hijacks by allowing that network on their platform:
    https://bgp.he.net/AS197426#_ix
    
    Kind regards,
    
    Job