nanog mailing list archives
Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:10:39 +0300
This is implementation specific. Consider hash result returning range 0-15. Then number of port count as divisor of 16/n must result in an integer value. To workaround this issue, you either have larger range of hash results, in which case unequal distribution has small bias, or you have different hash functions depending on port count so that that hash returns appropriate range for given port count. Certainly solvable problem, and generally non-issue. On 15 May 2018 at 21:46, Adam Atkinson <ghira () mistral co uk> wrote:
On 15/05/18 16:28, Mark Tinka wrote:That said, an even number of links just leaves the warm & fuzzies turned on :-)...Well, power of two, surely? 6 is even, but is not a "good" number of links for a lag group. (Extreme X8 supports up to 64 links in a group, and Enterasys up to 127 if I recall correctly. Though Enterasys, unusually, seems to support round-robin load balancing in which case the argument for powers of 2 numbers of links ceases to make sense.)
-- ++ytti
Current thread:
- is odd number of links in lag group ok Aaron Gould (May 15)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Jared Mauch (May 15)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Mark Tinka (May 15)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Adam Atkinson (May 15)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Saku Ytti (May 16)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Ben Cannon (May 15)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Mark Tinka (May 15)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Jared Mauch (May 15)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Wayne Bouchard (May 16)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Ben Cannon (May 21)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok Ben Cannon (May 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: is odd number of links in lag group ok Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (May 16)
