nanog mailing list archives
Re: Segment Routing
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:14:33 +0200
On 22/May/18 10:06, Matt Geary wrote:
Yes we are considering changing to SR on our backbone because LDP is not supported on the nexus switches. Although, we have no experience with SR and looks plainly simple but we loose some of the LSP path selection.
Got you. I'm more curious about use-cases for folk considering SR, than SR itself. 4 years on, and I still can't find a reason to replace my LDP network with SR. Your use-case makes sense, as it sounds like Cisco deliberately left LDP out of your box, considering SR is in. But that's a whole other discussion :-)... Mark.
Current thread:
- Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing James Bensley (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Ca By (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)
