nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news
From: Michel 'ic' Luczak <lists () benappy com>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 21:56:16 +0200
On 27 May 2018, at 21:41, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote: The way GDPR is written, if you want to collect (and store) so much as the IP address of the potential customer who visited your website, you need their informed consent and you can’t require that they consent as a condition of providing service.
What we were told is that since security > GDPR, storing IPs in logs is obviously OK since it’s a legal requirement. Storing them in a database for targeting / marketing is not. What is a gray area so far is any use of IDS/IPS… +
Current thread:
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news, (continued)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Michel 'ic' Luczak (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Sander Steffann (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Anne P. Mitchell Esq. (May 28)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Dan Hollis (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Royce Williams (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Dan Hollis (May 26)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Owen DeLong (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news niels=nanog (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Stephen Satchell (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news niels=nanog (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Michel 'ic' Luczak (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Sander Steffann (May 27)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Dan Hollis (May 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news John Levine (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news jeff murphy (May 24)
- Re: GDPR outside Europe, was Whois vs GDPR, latest news John Levine (May 24)
- Re: GDPR outside Europe, was Whois vs GDPR, latest news K. Scott Helms (May 25)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news bzs (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Owen DeLong (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news K. Scott Helms (May 23)
- Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news Mark Rousell (May 21)
