nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP protocol
From: Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:52:55 -0500
On 11/12/18 3:21 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
1. Most large networks (service providers) supporting MPLS will be using ISIS as their IGP. Some will have islands of OSPF because not everything speaks ISIS.
Notably, support for OSPF is somewhat common on "layer 3 switch" products while IS-IS support is significantly less common.
Most "router" products seem to support either.I was of the impression that there was a draft or similar for single-topology (IPv4+IPv6) OSPF. Did anything ever come of that?
-- Brandon Martin
Current thread:
- IGP protocol im (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Jared Mauch (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Ryan Kearney via NANOG (Nov 12)
- RE: IGP protocol Naslund, Steve (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol valdis . kletnieks (Nov 12)
- RE: IGP protocol Naslund, Steve (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Job Snijders (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Brandon Martin (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Aled Morris via NANOG (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Tashi Phuntsho (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol valdis . kletnieks (Nov 12)
- Re: IGP protocol Mark Tinka (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)
- Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol Baldur Norddahl (Nov 14)
- SV: IGP protocol Gustav Ulander (Nov 14)
- Re: IGP protocol James Bensley (Nov 15)
- Re: IGP protocol Saku Ytti (Nov 13)