nanog mailing list archives
Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking
From: Frank Habicht <geier () geier ne tz>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:11:37 +0300
On 27/11/2018 01:04, Scott Weeks wrote:
China Telecom's response: ... http://www.irasia.com/listco/hk/chinatelecom/press/p181122.htm
They forgot to mention that it's technically possible to filter advertisements from their customer. Which apparently they were/are not really doing.
So much for "working together for the healthy and orderly development of global Internet"...
Not saying they get more blame than MainOne, but also not less. Frank
Current thread:
- Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking Tore Anderson (Nov 05)
- Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking Hank Nussbacher (Nov 07)
- Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking Christopher Morrow (Nov 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking Alfie Pates (Nov 14)
- Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking Scott Weeks (Nov 14)
- Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking Scott Weeks (Nov 26)
- Re: China ’s Maxim – Leave No Access Point Unexploited: The Hidden Story of China Telecom’ s BGP Hijacking Frank Habicht (Nov 26)
