nanog mailing list archives
Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE
From: Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 01:06:17 -0400
Tom Ammon <thomasammon () gmail com> writes:
Are there any CPE vendors providing MAP-T features yet? I'm working on rolling v6 to residential subscribers and am trying to understand what the landscape looks like on the CPE side, for MAP-T specifically. What about 464XLAT on a CPE - is that a thing? I know that 464XLAT has been running for a while on some mobile provider networks, but are there any vendors out there with a decent/mature CLAT implementation in a CPE product that is ready to buy right now?
Good luck. I've been barking up the MAP-T tree with cable modem vendors for a couple of years already. Since I have literally 0 buying power in comparison to the likes of Comcast and Cox, I've gotten nowhere. -Daniel
Current thread:
- new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Tom Ammon (Oct 09)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Daniel Corbe (Oct 09)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Oct 09)
- RE: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Philip Loenneker (Oct 10)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Ca By (Oct 10)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Brock Tice (Oct 10)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Tom Ammon (Oct 11)
- RE: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Philip Loenneker (Oct 11)
- RE: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Aaron Gould (Oct 12)
- Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE Brock Tice (Oct 12)
