nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security

From: JASON BOTHE via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:38:40 -0500

Agreed, especially if they’re an active member of the organization and doesn’t seem to be synonymous with NANOGs 
Charter.  

Jason 

On Sep 30, 2018, at 22:41, Brian Kantor <Brian () ampr org> wrote:

To ensure unimpeded information sharing and discussion, the
Security Track will not be broadcast or recorded.


I fail to understand how making the presentations secret from all
except those attending in person promotes information sharing.
Could whoever made this seemingly contradictory decision explain
the reasoning behind it?
   - Brian

Current thread:

Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security Krassimir Tzvetanov (Sep 30)
- Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security Sam Oduor (Sep 30)
  - Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security Krassimir Tzvetanov (Sep 30)
    - RE: NANOG Security Track: Route Security Ryan Hamel (Sep 30)
    - Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security Brian Kantor (Sep 30)
    - Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security JASON BOTHE via NANOG (Sep 30)
    - Re: NANOG Security Track: Route Security Job Snijders (Sep 30)