nanog mailing list archives
Re: Special Counsel Office report web site
From: mike.lyon () gmail com
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:37:31 -0700
Deal. Though, like you, i am assuming it’ll just be another day on the intarwebs as well... We shall see! -Mike
On Apr 17, 2019, at 21:25, Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com> wrote: Hey Mike. Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I could be wrong. Hope to see you in DC to collect! I already know Brett is in. :) Best, -M<
Current thread:
- Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site), (continued)
- Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site) John Levine (Apr 18)
- Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Apr 18)
- RE: Special Counsel Office report web site Kain, Rebecca (.) (Apr 18)
- P2P [was: Special Counsel Office report web site] Rich Kulawiec (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Mel Beckman (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Marco Belmonte (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Randy Bush (Apr 18)
