nanog mailing list archives
We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site)
From: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell () isipp com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:18:05 -0600
Oops..the link would be helpful, sorry! We have made the full report available here, including conclusions (full report both embedded by iframe, and linked to the actual report at DOJ). https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/the-mueller-report-online-text-of-the-mueller-report-and-analysis/ Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Legislative Consultant CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute Legal Counsel: The Earth Law Center California Bar Association Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Colorado Cyber Committee Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose Ret. Chair, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
On Apr 18, 2019, at 8:33 AM, Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org> wrote: B&N just announced that they are offering free downloads via their Nook reader. I noticed I couldn’t reach B&N via IPv6, and discovered the cause : nslookupset type=AAAA barnesandnoble.comServer: 4.2.2.1 Non-authoritative answer: *** Can't find barnesandnoble.com: No answerset type=A barnesandnoble.com.Server: 4.2.2.1 Non-authoritative answer: Name: barnesandnoble.com Address: 161.221.74.213 I don’t know if this is a temporary DNS failure, or B&N really still has no IPv6 hosted web services :) -melOn Apr 18, 2019, at 6:46 AM, Naslund, Steve <SNaslund () medline com> wrote: Agreed, I remember the biggest problem when the Starr Report was released was that our dial-up PoPs had all lines busy. It was a different Internet then. Steven Naslund Chicago ILHey Mike. Agreed. But the scale of a 400 page document with global interest? Should be highly cached with a good ratio of served to pull bits. I'm willing to bet you a beer its just another day on the Internet. However, I could be wrong. Hope to see you in DC to collect! I already know Brett is in. :)
Current thread:
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site, (continued)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site fwessling--- via NANOG (Apr 17)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Mark Seiden (Apr 17)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site mike . lyon (Apr 17)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Martin Hannigan (Apr 17)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Brett Watson (Apr 17)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site mike . lyon (Apr 17)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Martin Hannigan (Apr 17)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Jared Mauch (Apr 18)
- RE: Special Counsel Office report web site Naslund, Steve (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Mel Beckman (Apr 18)
- We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Apr 18)
- Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site) John Levine (Apr 18)
- Re: We have it here, including the conclusions (was Re: Special Counsel Office report web site) Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Apr 18)
- RE: Special Counsel Office report web site Kain, Rebecca (.) (Apr 18)
- P2P [was: Special Counsel Office report web site] Rich Kulawiec (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Mel Beckman (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Marco Belmonte (Apr 18)
- Re: Special Counsel Office report web site Randy Bush (Apr 18)
