nanog mailing list archives
Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)
From: "Scott Christopher" <sc () ottie org>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:15:10 +0300
Rubens Kuhl wrote:
I don't think that "companies with tons of lawyers" should be a factor in making resource allocation policies. But considering either small or big networks, an escalation path would reduce friction and increase overall compliance... for instance, failure to have functioning abuse PoC could lead first to being inegible to receive new resources.
It's not about $BIGCORP having lots of corporate lawyers imposing its will on the small guys - it's about Amazon's role as a public utility, upon which many many many important things depend. S.C.
Current thread:
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?), (continued)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Stephen Satchell (Aug 04)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Rich Kulawiec (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Henry Yen (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) James R Cutler (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Bruce H McIntosh (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Dan Hollis (Aug 15)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Rich Kulawiec (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) John Curran (Aug 12)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Stephen Satchell (Aug 04)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) John Curran (Aug 04)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Rubens Kuhl (Aug 04)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Scott Christopher (Aug 05)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Matthew Petach (Aug 09)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Stephen Satchell (Aug 09)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Matthew Petach (Aug 13)
- Re: User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?) Stephen Satchell (Aug 13)
