nanog mailing list archives
Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 18:47:45 -0500
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 19:26:09 +0200, Saku Ytti said:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 19:14, Rob Foehl <rwf () loonybin net> wrote:Support claims that it was a mistake, but it's also been 15+ months and it's pretty deliberate behavior. Draw your own conclusions...TTL decrement issues are fairly common across multiple vendors and hw, can be sw can be hw limit
Yes, but you need to screw up gloriously on the decrement if you think that "I decremented and it's zero now" means "therefor it must have been addressed to me, so I'll send an ECHO REPLY instead of TTL EXCEEDED".
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS, (continued)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Javier J (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Peter Beckman (Dec 12)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Javier J (Dec 13)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Warren Kumari (Dec 13)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Stephen Frost (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Saku Ytti (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 11)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Dec 11)
- RE: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Aaron Gould (Dec 12)
- Re: Short-circuited traceroutes on FIOS Javier J (Dec 12)
